Europe puts off halogen ban until 2018

The European Commission today agreed with conventional lighting industry arguments and voted to postpone a ban on halogen lamps until September 2018.

It did not, however, extend the ban until 2020, which lighting industry body LightingEurope had lobbied for. The decision is sure to rankle newer, LED specialist companies like Neonlite and its Megaman brand, who had argued against any extension.

The EC had set the 2016 date back in 2009, giving the industry seven years to prepare for it. Halogens are a form of incandescent lamp – the EC has already banned others – and are highly inefficient compared to newer LED and CFL energy-saving lamps.

But the industry lobbied hard in recent months to delay the ban, saying that seven years was not going to be long enough. It argued among other things that Europe would face a lamp shortage because there would not be enough quality LED lamps to meet general demand.

Good news for guzzlers: The EC is not banning popular halogen spotlights nor other forms of halogens. The pear-shaped lamp gets a two-year reprieve before its 2018 exile. [Image: European Commission]

It also said the industry needed more time to develop LEDs with features to which consumers are accustomed, such as standard dimming, multi-directional light beams, and good colour rendering, at an affordable price.

'Postponing the phase-out will bring more efficient products to the market, and give consumers the possibility to choose the best performing lamp for their needs,' the EC said in a press release. It did not immediately clarify its logic – more efficient products like LED lamps are already coming into the market, and it's unclear how the 2018 extension will change that. Lux hopes to talk to the EC for an explanation.

'Switching from an average halogen lamp to an energy-efficient LED will already save approximately €115 ($124) over the LED's lifetime of up to 20 years, and pay back its cost within a year,' the release stated. 'This savings will increase further by 2018 with lower LED prices and a better LED performance.'

Applying the same logic, the EC claimed that sticking with a 2016 ban would have cost European consumers €1 billion ($1.1 billion) in energy savings which they will now get by waiting until 2018.

But it also pointed out that 'halogen lamps are very inefficient (energy efficiency class "D").'

It further noted that, 'novel technologies, such as LEDs offer a high savings potential: the consumption of a halogen lamp is often more than five times higher than the one of an energy-efficient LED. As a result, member states agreed in 2009 that such inefficient "D"-class halogen lamps should be phased-out from 1 September 2016.'

Some industry observers suggest that the EC delayed the ban to allow traditional lighting companies like Philips and Osram more time to adjust and to deal with difficult job losses associated with abandoning halogen.

'Everyone agrees that a maximum of around 6,800 job losses in halogen lamp production are inevitable and will happen irrespective of any policy intervention due to the arrival of LEDs,' the EC said. 'The phase-out of halogen lamps and faster market uptake of LEDs can help overcome some of these negative impacts by focusing on high value creation and employment opportunities in the EU. Deferring the phase-out to 1 September 2018 gives manufacturers the time to create replacement jobs in these areas, while supporting innovative companies in the EU providing novel lighting solutions based on LEDs.'

The ban does not apply to all halogens. It mainly covers pear-shaped bulbs that look like conventional incandescent lamps but contain a halogen component. It does not apply to spotlights or to many desk lamps.

LightingEurope Secretary General Diederik de Stoppelaar called the 2018 date an 'acceptable compromise.' He noted: 

  • 'The industry strongly supports — and has for years — the changeover to more energy-efficient lighting solutions. While 2020 was the ideal date for a phase-out of the popular domestic halogens, 2018 is an acceptable compromise. What consumers must realise, is that alternative developing technologies take time to be fully realised — and then to subsequently be widely available on the market.'

Lux hopes to bring you more on this story soon.

Meanwhile denying the industry a 2020 extension raises the question: Why not agree to a halogen tax if the industry wants even more years?

 

  • Lux will be holding a Connected Lighting in Retail Conference at the Cavendish Centre in central London on Wednesday 27 September 2017 . The event will consider how connected lighting can be utilised to interact with shoppers and what new technologies are best suited to this task. The conference will also advise you on the best ways to become a player in this exciting emerging market. You find out more and register to attend by clicking here

Comments 2

The gov't even have control over the type of bulb that light http://adrianacohen.com/dimwitted-policy-light-bulb-ban-bright-idea/ The best the government can do is stay out of our lives. Free market always is always better than politician at picking efficient solutions. The free market’s only bias is in appealing to people’s rational self-interest; i.e., if people figure out that Product A is more expensive or of lower quality than comparable substitute Product B, people will buy Product B. Let free market drive economy!!! We desperately need another Margaret Thatcher...

One day someone in the EU will stand back and say "Let's take an overall view on this, shall we?!!" http://freedomlightbulb.org/2015/04/the-unnecessary-continuation-of-light.html Why even LED makers CREE say a continued ban is unnecessary, along with others talking of a market conversion anyway of "ever desirable cheaper LEDs ", and little if any regulatory saving Taxation is an alternative anyway as you say and as seen has been raised before with other alternatives

Leave your comment